[PATCH v2] drm/msm: adreno: a6xx: enable GMU bandwidth voting for x1e80100 GPU

[Neil Armstrong]

Hi,

On 14/08/2025 13:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8/14/25 1:21 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 7/31/25 12:19 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 7/25/25 10:35 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> The Adreno GPU Management Unit (GMU) can also scale DDR Bandwidth along
>>>> the Frequency and Power Domain level, but by default we leave the
>>>> OPP core scale the interconnect ddr path.
>>>>
>>>> Declare the Bus Control Modules (BCMs) and the corresponding parameters
>>>> in the GPU info struct to allow the GMU to vote for the bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Used proper ACV perfmode bit/freq
>>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250721-topic-x1e80100-gpu-bwvote-v1-1-946619b0f73a@linaro.org
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> index 00e1afd46b81546eec03e22cda9e9a604f6f3b60..892f98b1f2ae582268adebd758437ff60456cdd5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> @@ -1440,6 +1440,17 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>   			.pwrup_reglist = &a7xx_pwrup_reglist,
>>>>   			.gmu_chipid = 0x7050001,
>>>>   			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>>> +			.bcms = (const struct a6xx_bcm[]) {
>>>> +				{ .name = "SH0", .buswidth = 16 },
>>>> +				{ .name = "MC0", .buswidth = 4 },
>>>> +				{
>>>> +					.name = "ACV",
>>>> +					.fixed = true,
>>>> +					.perfmode = BIT(3),
>>>> +					.perfmode_bw = 16500000,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Actually no, BIT(3) is for the CPU (OS), GPU should use BIT(2)
> 
> This is *very* platform-dependent, goes without saying..
> 
> I see BIT(2) is also valid for X1P4


I'm confused, Akhil can you confirm ?

Neil

> 
> Konrad