[PATCH v2 12/16] drm/msm/dsi: Add support for SM8750

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:41:33PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Add support for DSI on Qualcomm SM8750 SoC with notable difference:
> 
> DSI PHY PLLs, the parents of pixel and byte clocks, cannot be used as
> parents before DSI PHY is configured and the PLLs are prepared with
> initial rate is set.  Therefore assigned-clock-parents are not working
> here and driver is responsible for reparenting clocks with proper
> procedure: see dsi_clk_init_6g_v2_9().
> 
> Part of the change is exactly the same as CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE, however
> CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE won't work here because assigned-clock-parents are
> executed way too early - before DSI PHY is configured.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> SM8750 DSI PHY also needs Dmitry's patch:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542000/?series=119177&rev=1
> (or some other way of correct early setting of the DSI PHY PLL rate)
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h      |  2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c  | 25 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
> index 87496db203d6c7582eadcb74e94eb56a219df292..93c028a122f3a59b1632da76472e0a3e781c6ae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi);
>  int msm_dsi_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev);
>  int msm_dsi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);
>  int dsi_link_clk_set_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
> +int dsi_link_clk_set_rate_6g_v2_9(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>  int dsi_link_clk_set_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>  int dsi_link_clk_enable_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>  int dsi_link_clk_enable_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
> @@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ int dsi_dma_base_get_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, uint64_t *iova);
>  int dsi_dma_base_get_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, uint64_t *iova);
>  int dsi_clk_init_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>  int dsi_clk_init_6g_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
> +int dsi_clk_init_6g_v2_9(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>  int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi);
>  int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi);
>  void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
> index 7754dcec33d06e3d6eb8a9d55e53f24af073adb9..e2a8d6fcc45b6c207a3018ea7c8744fcf34dabd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,17 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sm8650_dsi_cfg = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static const struct msm_dsi_config sm8750_dsi_cfg = {

Can we use sm8650_dsi_cfg instead? What is the difference?

> +	.io_offset = DSI_6G_REG_SHIFT,
> +	.regulator_data = sm8650_dsi_regulators,
> +	.num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8650_dsi_regulators),
> +	.bus_clk_names = dsi_v2_4_clk_names,
> +	.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_4_clk_names),
> +	.io_start = {
> +		{ 0xae94000, 0xae96000 },
> +	},
> +};
> +

The rest LGTM. I'm not very happy regarding the clock handling, but it
seems we jave to live with it.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry