[Fribidi-discuss] Re: my Bidi implementation
Shachar Shemesh
fribidi-discuss at shemesh.biz
Wed Mar 17 02:18:07 EST 2004
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>Hummm, I think you are not missing anything, and most probably
>you are right. Right now that I think myself, I find it
>reasonable. I think the niether Arabeyes, nor PuTTY people
>really checked it on fsf.org. The scenario was that I said
>"FriBidi is LGPLed, you can dynamically link to it, like xterm
>does." And people said "No, we want putty.exe to be standalone,
>so FriBidi is not an option."
>
>Thanks for the note Shachar,
>--behdad
> behdad.org
>
>
They can't put the sources for fribidi inside their sources, or they
must clearly label it as a bunch of sources under a different license. I
don't see any problem with statically linking a library, though.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Systems Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
More information about the FriBidi
mailing list