replacing libsoup with nanohttp?

[keith preston]

I'm cool with it,    just a question but would it be that difficult, ugly to
support both?   I don't think there is a lot of code that does https, maybe
a simple ifdef ?   If it does seem difficult or ugly feel free to replace
the code.

Keith Preston


On 8/21/07, Jussi Kukkonen <jhkukkon at cc.hut.fi> wrote:
>
>
> Santtu had some valid points here (thanks for the input). Especially
> async and https support might be useful at some point -- still, I
> decided to try the nanohttp route for this release of maemo packages at
> least. Porting was easy (and should be easy if we ever want to go back),
> so I think I'll push this change to fd.o if everything seems to work out
> fine and no-one has objections.
>
>
> Some details:
> * nanohttp should pick up proxy settings automatically (so the code is
> somewhat smaller), but I haven't tested that -- let me know if it
> doesn't work.
>
> * soup apparently does some uri escaping itself. With nanohttp one has
> to use xmlURIEscapeStr() or similar when user input is accepted.
>
> -jussi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoClue mailing list
> GeoClue at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/geoclue
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/geoclue/attachments/20070821/4ab4e8cc/attachment.htm