[gstreamer-bugs] [Bug 438940] New: rtph263ppay - Support for Segment Fragmentation based on the GOB Headers

GStreamer (bugzilla.gnome.org) bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org
Wed May 16 09:58:35 PDT 2007


If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438940

  GStreamer | gst-plugins-good | Ver: HEAD CVS
           Summary: rtph263ppay - Support for Segment Fragmentation based on
                    the GOB Headers
           Product: GStreamer
           Version: HEAD CVS
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: gst-plugins-good
        AssignedTo: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
        ReportedBy: hexa00 at gmail.com
         QAContact: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Where's a patch to add another fragmentation mecasim :

Added Property fragmentation-mode  as defined below  :

  /* This algorithm assumes the H263+ encoder sends complete frames in each
   * buffer */
  /* With Fragmentation Mode at 0 :
   * This algorithm implements the Follow-on packets method for packetization.
   * This assumes low packet loss network. 
   * WIth Fragmentation Mode at 1 :
   * This algorithm separates large frames at synchronisation points (Segments)
(See RFC 2429

This must be used in conjuction with ffenc_h263 with the rtp-payload-size > 0
For the encoder to generate non empty GOB Headers

Patch is based on CVS from 16 May 2007

If you decide to allow to patch plz let me commit... :)

If you guys know a way to make the read by byte to find the next gob more
efficient it would be nice.. that's the one thing I feel uneasy about... 

I could read 4 bytes at a time but didn't have time to implement this .. and
not sure that in this case it would really be more efficient


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438940.




More information about the Gstreamer-bugs mailing list