[gstreamer-bugs] [Bug 564232] New: Dual Licensing qtmux

GStreamer (bugzilla.gnome.org) bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org
Fri Dec 12 03:09:50 PST 2008


If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564232

  GStreamer | gst-plugins-bad | Ver: HEAD CVS
           Summary: Dual Licensing qtmux
           Product: GStreamer
           Version: HEAD CVS
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: Normal
         Component: gst-plugins-bad
        AssignedTo: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
        ReportedBy: thiagoss at embedded.ufcg.edu.br
         QAContact: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
     GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Uraeus proposed that qtmux should be dual-licensed under MIT and GPL. As we
need all developers involved in qtmux to agree, I'm opening this bug so we can
all discuss.

I'm not a license expert (in fact, I know almost nothing about them), but
Uraeus told me that it would make it easier to bundle qtmux with some distros.
So I agreed that we should do this.

Counter arguments are welcome also.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564232.




More information about the gstreamer-bugs mailing list