[gstreamer-bugs] [Bug 515575] New: [lame] unit test shows memory leak

[GStreamer (bugzilla.gnome.org)]

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515575

  GStreamer | gst-plugins-ugly | Ver: HEAD CVS
           Summary: [lame] unit test shows memory leak
           Product: GStreamer
           Version: HEAD CVS
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: blocker
          Priority: Normal
         Component: gst-plugins-ugly
        AssignedTo: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
        ReportedBy: slomo at circular-chaos.org
         QAContact: gstreamer-bugs at lists.sourceforge.net
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Hi,
the pipelines/lame unit test shows some memleaks, one is easy to fix
(gst_caps_unref (allowed_caps); around line 1200), the other's are not exactly
easy to understand (output below only for these two).

The buffer that is leaked here (and the other thing is the GST_BUFFER_DATA) is
pushed downstream in any case so it shouldn't leak at all. Maybe weirdness in
core?

Running suite(s): lame
==29321== 
==29321== 356 (80 direct, 276 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
in loss record 3,406 of 3,477
==29321==    at 0x4024AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29321==    by 0x42C8985: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x42DDBFD: g_slice_alloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x42DE404: g_slice_alloc0 (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x41432A6: g_type_create_instance (in
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x407C724: gst_mini_object_new (gstminiobject.c:181)
==29321==    by 0x405D2F4: gst_buffer_new (gstbuffer.c:291)
==29321==    by 0x4A9FE09: gst_lame_chain (gstlame.c:1110)
==29321==    by 0x40828C8: gst_pad_chain_unchecked (gstpad.c:3523)
==29321==    by 0x4082F95: gst_pad_push (gstpad.c:3691)
==29321==    by 0x4A4926D: gst_base_transform_chain (gstbasetransform.c:1610)
==29321==    by 0x40828C8: gst_pad_chain_unchecked (gstpad.c:3523)
==29321==    by 0x4082F95: gst_pad_push (gstpad.c:3691)
==29321==    by 0x4A43B80: gst_base_src_loop (gstbasesrc.c:2111)
==29321==    by 0x409CB0F: gst_task_func (gsttask.c:192)
==29321==    by 0x42EA62A: (within /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x42E899E: (within /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x433D4FA: start_thread (in /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.7.so)
==29321==    by 0x442693D: clone (in /lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.7.so)
==29321== 
==29321== 
==29321== 8,480 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 3,474 of
3,477
==29321==    at 0x4024AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29321==    by 0x42C8985: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x4A9FCF8: gst_lame_chain (gstlame.c:1066)
==29321==    by 0x40828C8: gst_pad_chain_unchecked (gstpad.c:3523)
==29321==    by 0x4082F95: gst_pad_push (gstpad.c:3691)
==29321==    by 0x4A4926D: gst_base_transform_chain (gstbasetransform.c:1610)
==29321==    by 0x40828C8: gst_pad_chain_unchecked (gstpad.c:3523)
==29321==    by 0x4082F95: gst_pad_push (gstpad.c:3691)
==29321==    by 0x4A43B80: gst_base_src_loop (gstbasesrc.c:2111)
==29321==    by 0x409CB0F: gst_task_func (gsttask.c:192)
==29321==    by 0x42EA62A: (within /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x42E899E: (within /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1504.0)
==29321==    by 0x433D4FA: start_thread (in /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.7.so)
==29321==    by 0x442693D: clone (in /lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.7.so)


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515575.