[Bug 759355] splitmuxsink: documented pipeline example too simplistic to be useful

[GStreamer (GNOME Bugzilla)]

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759355

Tim-Philipp Müller <t.i.m at zen.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |t.i.m at zen.co.uk
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #1 from Tim-Philipp Müller <t.i.m at zen.co.uk> ---
It's an example. It's simplistic on purpose to distil the essence of what the
element does and how it works. Hooking up multiple streams to it is not much
different than hooking up multiple input streams to a muxer.

I'd be happy to add an example that involves both audio and video if you want
to suggest an example pipeline or example scenario.


> None of this makes any sense.

I have no idea what that means. Could you elaborate please? Just because an
example doesn't cover something you would like to see covered doesn't mean that
nothing makes sense. It's also not really a particularly helpful thing to say.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.