[Bug 744338] opusdec: LATENCY query handling looks wrong

[GStreamer (GNOME Bugzilla)]

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744338

--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Dufresne (stormer) <nicolas.dufresne at collabora.co.uk> ---
Make sense. Do the buffer size really varies ? If not, we can easily send a
latency update message on first buffer received. We could also do dynamic
upward update if needed (to prevent the pipeline from dropping forever).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.