[gst-devel] GNOME & GStreamer: take two

Christian Schaller Uraeus at linuxrising.org
Thu Aug 9 10:59:58 CEST 2001


On 09 Aug 2001 09:35:38 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Christian Schaller wrote:
> 
>  > On 07 Aug 2001 22:53:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> <snip>
>  > Actually, Sysadmins would want to be able to lock down such things to
> avoid
>  > having to support users who have messed up their configuration. Also
> 
> With preferences, they _can't_ mess up their configuration. I agree that 
> settings (which can mess up the computer) would need to be handled by 
> the sysadmin. I fail to see how you can mess up a gstreamer 
> _configuration_ though.
Mess up is a wide term, but something as simple as users switching from OSS 
to ESD when no ESD is installed generates extra work for the sysadmin
when the users don't understand how to set it back again themselves.
Never underestimate the ability of users to mess up their setup.


> from
>  >  a GNOME perspective one stop shopping for settings is prefereable.
>  >
>  > If we use the Gconf interface and not bonobo-config I think we will
>  > not need the Bonobo-activation (OAF) or Orbit dependency.
>  >
> 
> Here are the run-time dependencies for gconf:
> $ apt-cache show libgconf11 | grep Depends
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-1), libdb3 (>= 3.2.9-1), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0),
> libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.10-1), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.5), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.8),
> libxml1, oaf (>= 0.6.5), xlibs (>> 4.0.3), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.3)
> 
> OAF and Orbit in there...
> 
> Guess you were wrong ;)
Guess so :)

...but even so I don't think adding dependency to GNOME libraries on a 
GNOME control-center capplet should be a problem, especially if we supply a
compile without GConf option. :)

Christian





More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list