SBaker at CHELLO.com
Mon Aug 5 04:09:01 CEST 2002
My opinion on these is that they are not doing any harm, and we may want to
add extra behaviour to these functions in the future. For example,
gst_element_set_name could check its parent bin (if it has one) to make sure
the name is unique in that bin.
> On Monday 05 August 2002 12:10, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > please give http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89836 a look.
> > Should I remove gst_element_[sg]et_name ? are there objections ?
> BTW other functions, that duplicate GstObject functions, are:
> gst_element_get_parent (calls gst_object_set_parent)
> gst_element_set_parent (calls GST_OBJECT_PARENT)
More information about the gstreamer-devel