[gst-devel] License field patch

Steve Baker steve at stevebaker.org
Tue Sep 17 07:19:04 CEST 2002

Should the license string include the license version as well? It might
be valid info to include, but it might make the compliance calculations
more complex.

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 16:11, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 15:04, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> > Ok, here is my patch for adding a license field to GStreamer. I have
> > tested to work for the Goom plugin. If this core patch is ok, I will
> > progress to add license info to all plugins. 
> > 
> > The license I will list is the effective license. Meaning that plugins
> > based on GPL libs will be listed as GPL. Other plugins will probably all
> > be listed as LGPL as that is the license of our plugin code. Of course
> > if I find that the underlying library has a license that adds special
> > considerations I will list that license instead of the LGPL.
> you should also add something like:
> etc.
> So that people would use these in their plugins instead of the names.
> Will make it easier to translate once GST is to be i18ned.
> Cheers
> -- 
> /Bastien Nocera
> http://hadess.net
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! 
> Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer 
> Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel

More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list