[gst-devel] License field patch

[Steve Baker]

Should the license string include the license version as well? It might
be valid info to include, but it might make the compliance calculations
more complex.

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 16:11, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 15:04, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> > Ok, here is my patch for adding a license field to GStreamer. I have
> > tested to work for the Goom plugin. If this core patch is ok, I will
> > progress to add license info to all plugins. 
> > 
> > The license I will list is the effective license. Meaning that plugins
> > based on GPL libs will be listed as GPL. Other plugins will probably all
> > be listed as LGPL as that is the license of our plugin code. Of course
> > if I find that the underlying library has a license that adds special
> > considerations I will list that license instead of the LGPL.
> 
> you should also add something like:
> 
> #define GST_LICENSE_GPL "GPL"
> #define GST_LICENSE_LGPL "LGPL"
> etc.
> 
> So that people would use these in their plugins instead of the names.
> Will make it easier to translate once GST is to be i18ned.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> /Bastien Nocera
> http://hadess.net
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! 
> Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer 
> Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel