[gst-devel] "maintainer mode" vs "cvs mode"
Thomas Vander Stichele
thomas at apestaart.org
Thu Nov 6 17:08:30 CET 2003
Agree with Dave here, always have, always will. Projects that don't use
Werror tend to be lazy, tend to not get warnings fixed, and so on.
I want to *hear* from the ppc people when something is wrong, I don't
want them to ignore warnings. I want to hear from more exotic
architectures as well. I want them fixed as soon as they appear. Our
code has become very clean in this regard, I went through quite some
pain at the time, I want to keep it this way. I see no harm.
El jue, 06-11-2003 a las 21:46, David Schleef escribió:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:25:13PM +0100, in7y118 at public.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > There's a question that just occured to me when browsing d-d-l:
> >
> > Now that quite a lot of people build from cvs directly, wouldn't it be better
> > to have stuff like -Werror and all the things we do in "cvs mode" only be done
> > in maintainer mode?
>
> I want to hear about warnings/errors caused by strange setups. For
> the most part, we all use fairly similar toolchains. If people
> don't know about 'make CFLAGS=-Wno-error', it's about time they
> learned.
>
> > Or don't enough people use maintainer mode?
>
> The --enable-maintainer-mode option in autoconf is misleading. It
> should be called --enable-i-might-want-to-touch-the-source, which
> includes doing a 'cvs up' without rerunning autogen.sh. IMO, it
> should always be turned on, except for releases.
>
> One thing we might want to make default, though, is --disable-static.
> It would speed up compile times by a factor of 2.
>
>
>
> dave...
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list