[gst-devel] 0.9 proposals
ds at schleef.org
Sat Dec 4 15:39:01 CET 2004
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:22:13PM +0100, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> So basically, we're pretty screwed here. Writing chain-based demuxers
> (or state machines, as Dave calls them) is not all that good of an
> option. Seriously, Dave and Benjamin, you're not gonna write all those
a) It's not that hard.
b) demuxers will all share similar or identical states, and thus
could have the same structure or even share code.
More information about the gstreamer-devel