[gst-devel] 0.9 proposals

David Schleef ds at schleef.org
Sat Dec 4 15:39:01 CET 2004

On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:22:13PM +0100, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> So basically, we're pretty screwed here. Writing chain-based demuxers
> (or state machines, as Dave calls them) is not all that good of an
> option. Seriously, Dave and Benjamin, you're not gonna write all those
> elements.

a) It's not that hard.
b) demuxers will all share similar or identical states, and thus
   could have the same structure or even share code.


More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list