[gst-devel] GstPolyBin idea and request for comments

Stefan Kost ensonic at hora-obscura.de
Mon Mar 21 02:13:02 CET 2005

I've talked some more with bilboed about a possible solution.
The ideas is described in more detail on

We favour approach #1. It means to extend gst_elemnt a little. Anythings that 
speaks against doing this?

> hi,
> today we've discussed the GstController (next gen dparams) on IRC and 
> decided to add a G_PARAM_SPEC flag to mark gst_element properties as 
> controllable.
> There is another situation where I would like to add such a flag for.
> I've written it down at:
> http://www.buzztard.org/index.php/Polyphonic_elemnts
> So I would need a flag like GST_PARAM_POLYPHONIC. I sounds most useful 
> for audio, but I can imagine using it with graphical effects too.
> Are there any arguments against adding this flag?
> Stefan
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel

More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list