[gst-devel] HTTP source plugin

Demboski, Benjamin bendemboski at corp.aol.com
Tue Sep 19 19:24:54 CEST 2006


Is there an non-gnomevfs http source plugin in 0.10?

-----Original Message-----
From: gstreamer-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:gstreamer-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
Christian F.K. Schaller
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:10 AM
To: David SIORPAES
Cc: gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net; Michael Smith
Subject: Re: [gst-devel] HTTP source plugin

Hi David,
Yes, I think the gnomevfssrc is the only one. You might be able to cut
down its dependencies by grabbing some of the patches Nokia made to
gnomevfs to move it to dbus etc., from maemo.org. I have no idea how
well this would work though and I fear you might end up doing more work
that way compared to moving your app to 0.10

Christian

On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:18 +0200, David SIORPAES wrote:
> Michael Smith wrote: 
> > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:00 +0200, David SIORPAES wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I am using gstreamer in an embedded environment with quite limited

> > > resources and I need to use gstreamer-0.8.12 for compatibility
reasons 
> > > with some  applications.
> > > 
> > > I need to instantiate a gst element that acts as a HTTP source but
it 
> > > looks like the only one that can do the job is the gnomevfssrc
element. 
> > > I would not like to bloat my system with all the gnome libraries
this 
> > > plugin depends on so I am trying to sort out an alternative.
> > > 
> > > Old fashioned glib-based gsthttpsrc element is not there anymore, 
> > > whereas the neon-based plugin "gstneonhttp" is only available in
0.10 
> > > "bad" plugins package.
> > > 
> > > Is there any other solution I can look for before backporting the 
> > > neon-based element to 0.8 ? any other hint ?
> > >     
> > 
> > You are, of course, welcome to write a new 0.8 element using libneon
for
> > your purposes. However, it's fairly likely to be better for you to
> > upgrade your application(s) instead - 0.10 simply works a lot
better,
> > more reliably, and the existing plugins are generally more stable
and
> > better supported.
> > 
> > Also, I doubt anyone will be interested in helping you with 0.8 at
all -
> > if you choose this route, you'll be entirely on your own.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> >   
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for your prompt reply.
> I will check the effort required to upgrade my gstreamer applications
> to 0.10 and move on.
> 
> Can you confirm the only way to have an HTTP source in 0.8.12 is to
> instantiate a gnomevfssrc element ?
> 
> thanks & regards,
> 
> David S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
> _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel
mailing list gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel




More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list