[gst-devel] HTTP source plugin

David SIORPAES david.siorpaes at st.com
Wed Sep 20 09:51:35 CEST 2006


Hi Christian,

yes, I also guess that it would be easier (and more valuable) to port my 
application to 0.10 - so I will take that route.
Is there any sort of "Moving gstreamer applications to 0.10" guide 
around ? that would save me some time..

thanks & regards,


David S.



Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
> Hi David,
> Yes, I think the gnomevfssrc is the only one. You might be able to cut
> down its dependencies by grabbing some of the patches Nokia made to
> gnomevfs to move it to dbus etc., from maemo.org. I have no idea how
> well this would work though and I fear you might end up doing more work
> that way compared to moving your app to 0.10
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:18 +0200, David SIORPAES wrote:
>   
>> Michael Smith wrote: 
>>     
>>> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:00 +0200, David SIORPAES wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am using gstreamer in an embedded environment with quite limited 
>>>> resources and I need to use gstreamer-0.8.12 for compatibility reasons 
>>>> with some  applications.
>>>>
>>>> I need to instantiate a gst element that acts as a HTTP source but it 
>>>> looks like the only one that can do the job is the gnomevfssrc element. 
>>>> I would not like to bloat my system with all the gnome libraries this 
>>>> plugin depends on so I am trying to sort out an alternative.
>>>>
>>>> Old fashioned glib-based gsthttpsrc element is not there anymore, 
>>>> whereas the neon-based plugin "gstneonhttp" is only available in 0.10 
>>>> "bad" plugins package.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any other solution I can look for before backporting the 
>>>> neon-based element to 0.8 ? any other hint ?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> You are, of course, welcome to write a new 0.8 element using libneon for
>>> your purposes. However, it's fairly likely to be better for you to
>>> upgrade your application(s) instead - 0.10 simply works a lot better,
>>> more reliably, and the existing plugins are generally more stable and
>>> better supported.
>>>
>>> Also, I doubt anyone will be interested in helping you with 0.8 at all -
>>> if you choose this route, you'll be entirely on your own.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>> I will check the effort required to upgrade my gstreamer applications
>> to 0.10 and move on.
>>
>> Can you confirm the only way to have an HTTP source in 0.8.12 is to
>> instantiate a gnomevfssrc element ?
>>
>> thanks & regards,
>>
>> David S.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
>>     
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20060920/11ccf781/attachment.htm>


More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list