[gst-devel] Bumping the GLib requirement to GLib-2.12?

[Tim Müller]

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:05 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:

> We're still tied heavily to fc5, so I would appreciate still working
> against that.  

That means bumping the requirement to 2.10 for now would be ok, right?


> We could roll in a newer glib package in the next testing cycle we have
> though, which would be within the next 2-3 months.

Great, sounds like a plan. Out of curiosity: I was wondering how bumping
the requirements in CVS affects your production platform exactly - care
to elaborate a bit? (Surely you're not just dropping releases into the
running system between 'testing cycles', so why wait?)


> Right now I'm still building packages on the website for fc4 and fc5 btw

Oh, you are? I was under the impression those hadn't been updated for
eternities.

 Cheers
  -Tim