seeking in mpegtsdemux
Edward Hervey
bilboed at gmail.com
Tue Feb 22 09:14:02 PST 2011
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 15:17 +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently writing seeking support for the MPEG TS demuxer rewrite.
> Since MPEG TS as streaming format lacks any index the seeking
> implementation has to build it's own index.
>
> The basic algorithm I intend to use is an hinted binary search. For
> constant bitrate streams estimating the position and a linear search
> from the estimated position should work well. Variable bitrate streams
> can vary too much (factor 3 is not unusual for HD H.264 broadcast).
>
> So the idea is to do a binary search but instead of choosing the
> midpoint for the next iteration a educated guess based on the average
> bitrate of the segment is taken. The average bitrate will converge to
> the actual bitrate as the segments get smaller. Of course only up to a
> certain point, 2 B-frames will be smaller than an I-frame but at this
> point a linear search should be used.
>
> For large files this algorithm should need less seeks than a simple
> binary at the file system level. I've already started and hope to have
> something working at the end of the week.
>
> There are currently two issues I would like to get some feedback on.
>
> *handling of multiple program/streams:
> I can't think of a valid example where multiple programs in a single
> multiplex have different durations (assuming they both stay "on-air").
> Unless someone can think of valid use case, the scaffold will be per
> file and not per program/stream.
Programs and streams are meant to use the same clock rate, therefore
you shouldn't have to worry about that.
In pull-mode, you should only have to worry about the selected program
(or the first one you encounter).
>
> *frame accurate seeking:
> seeking to the frame with the desired PTS is unfortunately only part
> of the solution. If the application wants to seek to a correctly decoded
> (bi-)predicted frame the demuxer needs to return all reference frames
> too. This is not too hard for MPEG2 video but MPEG2 is becoming
> obsolete. H264 is unfortunately much more complex (not speaking about
> other video codecs). The random access indicator in the adaption field
> is unfortunately not reliable. I haven't seen it set.
I checked the usage of the random_access_indicator on various files
locally, and it indeed doesn't seem to be used.
At least you can speed up the scanning process by only looking for
packets with have payload_unit_start_indicator set.
>
> I'll probably have more questions as I implement it.
>
> Janne
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list