is such a pipeline possible (image)

[Olivier Crête]

Hi,

Such a pipeline is the right way to do it, but you're very likely to hit
some corner case. You may want to make the sinks have async=false for a
start. I've been meaning for a long time to write this kind of
application with Farstream, but I never got to it.

Olivier

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 13:51 +0100, Michael Niemand wrote:
> Hey folks,
> 
> I still working on this conferencing solution, but I am also still
> stuck at the same thing.
> 
> The problem with the audio part is, that each participant should not
> hear himself. So I constructed the pipeline as in the picture. It
> doesn't put out any packets though.
> 
> If I use a rtpmuxer and only one udpsink / multiudpsink at the end, it
> works, but then any participant gets the muxed audio of all
> participants.
> 
> Any comment is appreciated!
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Niemand
> 
> Albusstr. 17
> 60313 Frankfurt/M
> Germany
> 
> 
> Tel.: +49 (0) 69 200 130 60
> Mobile: +49 (0) 171 645 29 07
> 
> 
> eMail: michael.niemand at gmail.com
> sip:1406283 at sipgate.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20120228/3cb7cbd3/attachment.pgp>