Lame and Faad license ambiguity
Baby Octopus
jagadishkamathk at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 23:00:04 PST 2012
Hi,
I understand Lame comes under LGPL. But why is it a part of ugly plugin?
Also, FAAD is covered under GPL. Why is it a bad plugin?
Can somebody through some light on this please?
Regards,
Jagadish
--
View this message in context: http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/Lame-and-Faad-license-ambiguity-tp4656803.html
Sent from the GStreamer-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list