Lame and Faad license ambiguity

Baby Octopus jagadishkamathk at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 23:00:04 PST 2012


Hi,

I understand Lame comes under LGPL. But why is it a part of ugly plugin? 
Also, FAAD is covered under GPL. Why is it a bad plugin?

Can somebody through some light on this please?

Regards,
Jagadish



--
View this message in context: http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/Lame-and-Faad-license-ambiguity-tp4656803.html
Sent from the GStreamer-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list