Lame and Faad license ambiguity

Tim-Philipp Müller t.i.m at zen.co.uk
Tue Nov 6 03:26:13 PST 2012


On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:00 -0800, Baby Octopus wrote:

Hi,

> I understand Lame comes under LGPL. But why is it a part of ugly plugin? 
> Also, FAAD is covered under GPL. Why is it a bad plugin?
> 
> Can somebody through some light on this please?

What Nicolas said, and:

http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/splitup.html

Cheers
 -Tim



More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list