ximagesrc performance.

[Stirling Westrup]

Just for the record, it turns out that I had to turn off 'use-damage'
in order to get decent performance. No idea why sending whole frames
worked out faster than just sending block updates. My guess is there
is something strange in how ximagesrc is using damage info. At least
under CentOS. Don't know about other ports.


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Stirling Westrup <swestrup at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Nox Deleo <noxdeleo at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I doubt this'll be greatly relevant, but there's a program called xpra that
>> runs a headless X server and redirects it. They've got a few performance
>> tricks mentioned if I remember rightly, so maybe it'd be worth a quick look
>> under the hood, if only for some fresh ideas.
>
> I'll check it out, but I will probably need to be able to read from a
> full session as well.



-- 
Stirling Westrup
Programmer, Entrepreneur.
https://www.linkedin.com/e/fpf/77228
http://www.linkedin.com/in/swestrup
http://technaut.livejournal.com
http://sourceforge.net/users/stirlingwestrup