gst_element_query_duration

badea_ion at gmx.fr badea_ion at gmx.fr
Mon Jul 1 09:25:08 PDT 2013


Hello,

Indeed, yes, I wrongly set up the title of this post 'gst_element_query_duration' instead of 'gst_element_query_position', so the position is what matters for me.
Probably in GStreamer 1.0 there's a different sintax regarding pointers vs. references, but here I'm concerned about 0.10.28 vs. 0.10.36 versions of GStreamer because this what they use in the project I work on.

Thank you,
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: Florin Curelaru
Sent: 06/28/13 08:25 PM
To: gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: gst_element_query_duration

Hi again, Actually, I think there is a confusion in this post as the subject/title of the post is gst_element_query_duration, but in the sample code it appears gst_element_query_position (they are totally different) and no gst_element_query_duration call. If you are interested in gst_element_query_position, then please tell me whether the audioresample element is active or not. In other words, when you remove audioresample, is the issue still present (assuming a common sampling rate - DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE in your code - like 44100)? -- View this message in context: http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/gst-element-query-duration-tp4660766p4660811.html Sent from the GStreamer-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20130701/9f9b0ea2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list