audioresample quality

[chad hanna]

Hi,

I will go out on a limb and say in my experience the current audioresample
element is excellent.   You should not need any additional antialiasing
filter.  I am actually part of a group that uses it for scientific
applications and we are pretty picky :)  I would be surprised if you were
disappointed.  But it really is something you will have to verify against
your requirements.

best,

Chad


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Baby Octopus <jagadishkamathk at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does anyone has any experience in using audioresample element to get the
> best quality(speed ignored) while downsampling? There is a property named
> quality which can be set to 10 for best quality. Is the inbuilt filter of
> audiresample good enough to knockoff high frequency components to avoid
> aliasing or we need audiofirfilter or audioiirfilter as antialiasing
> filter?
>
> Any data point will really help :)
>
> ~BO
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/audioresample-quality-tp4662108.html
> Sent from the GStreamer-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
>



-- 
Chad Hanna
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
31 Caroline St. N.
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 2Y5
Ph: (519) 569-7600 x7511
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20130920/e5bd19c7/attachment.html>