R: Re: Good platform for a low latency h264 encoder?
pier.cvn at libero.it
pier.cvn at libero.it
Fri Mar 20 09:36:24 PDT 2015
No, the nitrogen6x doesn't have any direct HDMI input, if not via an external $300 board, similarly to what is going to happen soon with the RPi.Imx6 has a VPU, but so does the RPi, with it's own gstreamer pipeline plugin.
I'm just wondering if any of the two are considerably better for a sub frame encoder, but I guess not :)
----Messaggio originale----
Da: dv at pseudoterminal.org
Data: 20/03/2015 17.16
A: <gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>
Ogg: Re: Good platform for a low latency h264 encoder?
On 03/20/2015 05:03 PM,
pier.cvn at libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I would like to develop an application that used a sub-frame
h264 encoder with gstreamer. I was thinking about simply using a
RPi, however I see that the majority of this list is focused on
iMX.6 or other platforms instead, that are more expensive.
My two possible inputs are a CSI camera and an HDMI input,
and both need to be implemented in similar ways, (eg, the imx6
doesn't have, for example, a direct HDMI input interface).
Is there any reason I'm missing for this preference towards
imx6?
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
gstreamer-devel mailing list
gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
I believe some imx6 devices have a direct HDMI input interface. The
nitrogen6x perhaps. Consult Boundary Devices.
The imx6 is pretty popular here, mainly because of the CODA patches
that are going into the mainline Linux kernel. These use the imx6
VPU for hardware accelerated video decoding over V4L2. And GStreamer
has since version 1.4 V4L elements for decoding.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20150320/1ed7ff0c/attachment.html>
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list