gstreamer application versus gst-launch pipeline

[Duncan Palmer]

I doubt the bins would be causing any issues. Have you checked the element
properties (should be in the .dot dump)?

On 19 July 2016 at 18:52, nagendra sarma <nagendra.bankupalli at tessolve.com>
wrote:

> hi All
>
>  i have got the gstremer pipelines  of both application and raw pipeline
> the major differece is bins
> i have used bins to manipulate two streams (having same source), which is
> not present in raw pileline
>
> my pipeline is
>                               |---->q1-->encode1-->tsmux2-->udpsink1
> (bin-1)
>                               |
> video source--->TEE--|---->q2-->scale2->encode2-->tsmux2-->udpsink2 (bin-2)
>
> in above bin 1 is for stream-1 and bin2 is for stream-2
> the Tee is directly connected to q of bin 1 in case of raw pipeline
> but i used bins (q+encode+sink) for each stream, and ghost pad created
> (bin-->q) which  is used to connect to Tee src pad
>
> TEE(src)---->(ghost-sink)--->q(sink)
>
> is it possible to avoid bins in my application ? is bins creating problem ?
>
> regards
> nagendra
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/gstreamer-application-versus-gst-launch-pipeline-tp4678733p4678744.html
> Sent from the GStreamer-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20160721/d2d15bb5/attachment.html>