<div dir="ltr">I suggest enabling the log. My first suspect, it is something related to the SSRC/TS of the new stream. You can give a try with the rtpbin that contains the jitter. </div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:29 AM Nicolas <<a href="mailto:nicolas@ubble.ai">nicolas@ubble.ai</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Matteo, Arjen and all, We've made a series of tests on the GStreamer pipeline, as well as running GStreamer in the same machine as Janus. We ended up with a setup that seems to yield a good quality for our use case: - adding a rtpjitterbuffer as suggested (without playing with latency for now) - adding threads to the vp8dec element (threads=4) - running GStreamer natively instead of within Python This uncovered another issue... we're streaming 3 successive sequences. In between each sequence, the publisher stops the stream, then relaunch a new one, forwarded in a similar way to GStreamer. GStreamer is unchanged. This works fine with all setups we tested *except* when we use a Jitterbuffer. When a Jitterbuffer is used, nothing is received for the second scene. Do you have any idea where the issue might be coming from? Thanks, nicolas -- Sent from: <a href="http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://gstreamer-devel.966125.n4.nabble.com/</a> _______________________________________________ gstreamer-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:gstreamer-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank">gstreamer-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/gstreamer-devel</a> </blockquote></div> -- <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">“There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult.” - Tony Hoare</div>