[Gstreamer-openmax] [PATCH 1/2] use G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS
Clark, Rob
rob at ti.com
Mon Mar 8 07:50:12 PST 2010
On Mar 8, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Rob Clark wrote:
>> as suggested by Stefan Kost
>> ---
>
> This patch doesn't apply, and it's weird because it says 1/2, but I
> don't see the 0/2 patch.
It should apply on top of your 'remove unused set_property()' patch.. or at least that is the theory.
I made the patch on top of your patches which had not been committed yet, because I figured they would be committed soon, and that would be easier than rebasing.. Have a look at:
http://gitorious.org/robclark-gstreamer/gst-openmax/commits/patches-1c
to see the order of patches
BR,
-R
>
>> --- a/omx/gstomx_base_filter.c
>> +++ b/omx/gstomx_base_filter.c
>> @@ -260,17 +260,17 @@ type_class_init (gpointer g_class,
>> g_object_class_install_property (gobject_class, ARG_COMPONENT_NAME,
>> g_param_spec_string ("component-name", "Component name",
>> "Name of the OpenMAX IL component to use",
>> - NULL, G_PARAM_READABLE));
>> + NULL, G_PARAM_READABLE | G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS));
>>
>> g_object_class_install_property (gobject_class, ARG_LIBRARY_NAME,
>> g_param_spec_string ("library-name", "Library name",
>> "Name of the OpenMAX IL implementation library to use",
>> - NULL, G_PARAM_READABLE));
>> + NULL, G_PARAM_READABLE | G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS));
>>
>> g_object_class_install_property (gobject_class, ARG_USE_TIMESTAMPS,
>> g_param_spec_boolean ("use-timestamps", "Use timestamps",
>> "Whether or not to use timestamps",
>> - TRUE, G_PARAM_READWRITE));
>> + TRUE, G_PARAM_READWRITE | G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS));
>> }
>> }
>>
>
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
More information about the Gstreamer-openmax
mailing list