hal: Branch 'origin' - 3 commits
Danny Kukawka
danny.kukawka at web.de
Mon Sep 25 00:23:48 PDT 2006
On Monday 25 September 2006 00:01, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 20:37 -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> > Uh, I didn't do it...
>
> That's just git acting up I think or so someone with more knowledge told
> me once. Does anyone (Kay?) know how to fix this? We don't really need
> to track the origin branch; all we need is 'master' and the various
> branches off releases...
I have no idea, how to fix it, but there are also some other issues which
sucks on (current) git (config):
* see commit mail from David: [1], which contains a already commited patch
from Artem. This make the patch/change nearly unreadable in the mail and you
can't use the mail as patch for e.g. a diff for a released package.
* the subject of the commit mails say nothing about the change/commit. Only
all the time this "hal: Branch 'master'" stuff. I would like to see the same
as in CVS/SVN before. The name of the branch and the first line of the _real_
commit as mail subject.
Danny
[1]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal-commit/2006-September/002775.html
More information about the hal-commit
mailing list