supermount

[Robert Love]

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 20:11 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> in other words, here's another possible tiny variation on the same
> fstab-sync theme: another possible format for fstab-sync to understand,
> but exactly the same semantics / handling.
> 
> ... is it _really_ worth the extra binary? (fstab-sync-supermount)

No, no, no.  The entire purpose of HAL and fstab-sync is not to use crap
like supermount.

Please. ;)

	Robert Love


_______________________________________________
hal mailing list
hal at freedesktop.org
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/hal