HAL battery backend, new thread!

[Richard Hughes]

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 23:14 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Another point: Doesn't make it sense to add the *.reporting.* keys only if the 
> reported keys are normalised to mWh? If the machine reports them already as 
> mWh the output of lshal looks a little bit 'stange' with all this 
> 'duplicated' keys/values.

I wondered this myself, and came to the conclusion that we are providing
an abstracted interface, that all ACPI batteries should have.

I do see your point tho.

David?

Richard.

_______________________________________________
hal mailing list
hal at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/hal