[PATCH] lost volume.mount_point when unmounting...

Danny Kukawka danny.kukawka at web.de
Fri Oct 28 04:28:58 PDT 2005

On Friday 28 October 2005 02:01, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
> I don't understand why it's so bad to have volume.mount_point kept at
> the old value when a volume is unmounted?

This is so bad, because you provide wrong device propertys and we never want 
provide inactuall, incorrect or unknown data. If the device is not mounted, 
there is also no mountpoint, this is a fact. I don't see why we should 
provide old data. If a application need this IMO the application must 
implemtent this self.



More information about the hal mailing list