hughsient at gmail.com
Mon Oct 31 11:05:32 PST 2005
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 11:36 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 18:13 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Eigh? You said libhal was depreciated and a glib version of libhal was
> > off the cards. I've been carrying a (somewhat incomplete) glib libhal
> > implementation in g-p-m for a few months now.
> What's wrong with having this kind of library?
In HAL or seporate? I can knock up a patch if you so desire.
More information about the hal