Next CK release?

[Doug Goldstein]

Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2007/4/6, Doug Goldstein <cardoe at gentoo.org>:
>
>>
>> Been meaning to ask... Can you stick a "AC_DISABLE_STATIC" before
>> "AC_PROG_LIBTOOL"? It keeps building up static versions of the libraries
>> (pam and such).
>
> Would that affect libck_connector too or only the pam module?
> Having a static version of libck_connector could be useful imho.
>
> Michael
AC_DISABLE_STATIC would affect libck_connector as well. However I don't
really see this being too good as you have to remember you need to
static in all of it's depends and now you're talking about D-Bus and
such. But hey.. if ya want it... it's going to take a bit of
autoconf-foo magic.