[Pm-utils] Why do we still ship hal-system-power-pmu / PMU support suboptimal in pm-utils

[Till Maas]

On Tuesday 04 December 2007 23:05:58 Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:07 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > > I would help forking pm-utils, but I do not dare to do this by
> >
> > myself. I asked
> >
> > > for cvs commit access to help upstream, but nobody cared / read my
> >
> > mail or
> >
> > > bugzilla entry, so forking seems to be the only sane way. Unless you
> >
> > want to
> >
> > > abandon pm-utils, of course.
> >
> > I've seen the account requests stagnate on other fd.o projects, so
> > maybe we can push this along. Richard, you're assigned to this bug.
>
> Sure. I'm frustrated by this too. Peter Jones is the official maintainer
> of pm-utils, but he's been quiet recently. Peter, is is okay if I ack
> and commit some of the patches on the mailing list?

Did you BCC him? I CC'ed him now. He told me once he gets too many mails, so 
that it is very likely that he did not read yours (or will not read this...). 
Do you maybe have other means to contact him?

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20071208/20143f42/attachment.pgp