UWB Addon

[David Zeuthen]

On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 22:05 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > I agree. My intention was send the skeleton to provide a high level
> > view. Anyway, the addon can be not be integrated yet because the Addon
> > sigleton patchset is required.
> 
> I know, but we are getting there. David, hint :)

I've just merged that!

> > I don't have experience on HAL, I expect validate the design first and
> > after that define the UWB API. Use the same/similar names used by
> > BlueZ sounds good. The path is another problem, path based on UDI is a
> > little unclear for the end users/developers. Instead of use UDI(eg:
> > /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_8086_c3b_UWB_if0_uwb_hci_14a5cd96c9)
> > we can try use a friendly path, but currently I don't how do that.
> 
> Actually you put capabilities on a UDI path and then enumerate based on
> that capabilities. UDIs are like paths. There should have no implied
> meaning whatsovever.

Yeah, as a matter of fact the UDI's are intentionally ugly such as to
discourage use of them in any user interface :-)

       David