[Pm-utils] Re: Resume via quirks, not using the DBUS method, Was: Release Candidates ?

[Peter Jones]

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:23 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>:
> >
> > I find myself wondering if /etc/pm/config shouldn't really
> > be /usr/lib/pm-utils/config , actually.  That would make /etc/pm
> > entirely the domain of the admin (and any ISV software he adds)
> 
> Imo putting config files in /usr/lib/ is a bad idea. No one expects
> them in /usr/lib, Debian policies forbid it and I also think the FHS
> does not promote this.

But that's the point -- they're not config files, they're system
scripts.  *All* of the behavior can be configured through the files
under /etc/pm/ .  Really the file named "config" is more like "default
configuration".

-- 
  Peter