[Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Frederic Crozat]

Le vendredi 04 mai 2007 à 00:19 +0200, Holger Macht a écrit :
> On Fri 04. May - 00:12:24, Holger Macht wrote:
> > On Thu 03. May - 21:55:14, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:40 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > > > The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is that
> > > > > removing the quirk would break resume if you suspend via init=/bin/bash
> > > > > (the testcase) or console. This change only work under X. All this has
> > > > > nothing to do with s2ram, only with the suspend itself.
> > > >
> > > > I'll rephrase my questions
> > > >
> > > >  1. Is it correct than s2ram has it's own list of quirks?
> > > 
> > > Currently yes
> > 
> > To be a little bit pernickety, actually HAL is using its own list no one
> > else is using AFAIK ;-) Every distro I know of currently uses the s2ram
> > internal one.
> 
> Ok, just reading a mail from Tim Dijkstra where he explains that debian is
> preferring the hal whitelist in first place if available and just uses the
> s2ram whitelist as a fallback. So I'm wrong here.

I don't want to start a distro war here, but FYI, Mandriva 2007 Spring
is using hal whitelist too.

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at mandriva.com>
Mandriva