ConsoleKit 0.2.4
Danny Kukawka
danny.kukawka at web.de
Thu Jan 24 06:40:18 PST 2008
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 5:15 AM, Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka at web.de> wrote:
> > Btw. There is also absolute no reason to move any kind of powermanagement
> > stuff to CK. I would bet: Nobody of the powermanagement developer would
> > like to maintain/handle another (additional) tool for pm-tasks. HAL
> > should do the job, this is what all the distributions decided and do now
> > for good reasons.
>
> Again, somebody should show the imaginary layers that keep being mentioned
> here. These are just dbus services on the same bus.
Simple:
- ConsoleKit is a framework for defining and tracking users, login
sessions, and seats. (from README)
- HAL do hardware and system abstraction
And such stuff as shutdown and clearly also powermanagement belongs into hal
and not ConsoleKit. Why the hell mixup them?
Btw. it doesn't matter if it is the same bus. It are different services and as
a application developer I don't want to call two different services if they
should be in one service! With you logic I can put everything into ConsoleKit
as e.g. mounting, killswitch handling or what ever.
Danny
More information about the hal
mailing list