danny.kukawka at web.de
Thu Jan 24 06:44:51 PST 2008
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, William Jon McCann wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 9:06 AM, Matthias Clasen <matthias.clasen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 24, 2008 5:15 AM, Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka at web.de> wrote:
> > > Btw. There is also absolute no reason to move any kind of
> > > powermanagement stuff to CK. I would bet: Nobody of the powermanagement
> > > developer would like to maintain/handle another (additional) tool for
> > > pm-tasks. HAL should do the job, this is what all the distributions
> > > decided and do now for good reasons.
> > Again, somebody should show the imaginary layers that keep being
> > mentioned here. These are just dbus services on the same bus.
> Also, I'm failing to see how shutting down system services has
> anything to do with a DeviceKit.
... F****** CamelCase kits ... (only my opinion)
It belongs IMO more into the powermanagement interface of HAL then in
ConsoleKit. Why always soften the concept of a tool? Let do ConsoleKit do the
job it was developed for and don't mix it up with other tasks.
More information about the hal