[hal-info PATCH] Rationalise Acer keyboard map
Matthew Garrett
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Jun 24 03:03:58 PDT 2008
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:07:23AM +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> And what about the conserns regarding performance and mapping unneeded keys
> (especially on machines that need no mapping which is connected to loss of
> performance). There e.g. is no usefull way blacklist machines if they need no
> mapping ... etc.
The performance loss is minimal (as you demonstrated) and nothing is
broken by having extra mappings. What's the issue here?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the hal
mailing list