Reason for reverting hal fix for !PK

Martin Pitt martin at
Mon Mar 3 06:38:09 PST 2008

Hi David,

I just noticed that you reverted the fix for making hal work without
PKP [1] a little later in [2], but [2] does not state any reason.

Why was that done? In Ubuntu I don't care much any more (we have used
PK for a long time), but Debian doesn't yet, and still it seems to be
much more correct to leave it in place.

Thank you!


Martin Pitt                        |
Ubuntu Developer (  | Debian Developer  (

My 5 today: #195799 (smplayer-themes), #195389 (deluge-torrent), #195812
(hipo), #195177 (qlandkarte), #196100 (xserver-xorg-video-trident)
Do 5 a day - every day!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the hal mailing list