Reason for reverting hal fix for !PK

[Martin Pitt]

Hi David,

I just noticed that you reverted the fix for making hal work without
PKP [1] a little later in [2], but [2] does not state any reason.

Why was that done? In Ubuntu I don't care much any more (we have used
PK for a long time), but Debian doesn't yet, and still it seems to be
much more correct to leave it in place.

Thank you!

Martin

[1] http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commit;h=9d607e21cac65dddaf0c8cb2443865d9ae509393
[2] http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commit;h=42174283c756d377d2f1f2f346d32aec502d4769
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

My 5 today: #195799 (smplayer-themes), #195389 (deluge-torrent), #195812
(hipo), #195177 (qlandkarte), #196100 (xserver-xorg-video-trident)
Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20080303/533228d7/attachment.pgp