should service providers like hal and udev have own scripting engines and script folders???

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:10:45PM +0200, ext Dennis Heuer wrote:
> the configuration of hal should be put into the hands of
> the admin (or his system tools)

It is.

> and done at runtime.

It can be.

> This said, the development of fdi rules should not be done in an
> alchemist's kitchen but as an own, open reference project.

It is.

I tried to understand the rest of your mail, but don't.  This is a HAL
development list.  If you don't like HAL, please just go somewhere else
and stop being abusive.  Develop your own solution and convince everyone
else to use it, since it's so obviously superior.

EOT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20080506/673f707c/attachment-0001.pgp