[HarfBuzz] New Indic standard?
samjnaa at gmail.com
Fri Aug 21 09:54:43 PDT 2009
On Friday 21 August 2009 09:56 PM, Ed Trager wrote:
> (2.2). The "NATIVES" like Shriramana will for the most part be
> able to just "eyeball" problematic or questionable forms.
> (2.3) Hopefully some of the "NATIVES" are also picky
> typographers who can also point out cases that are technically
> "correct" but which suffer from poor or less-than-ideal placement of
> reph, diacritic vowels, poorly-joined "half" forms, etc.
Me, me, me! :D
> (4) It would also be nice to eventually include in the test data cases
> covering the issues mentioned by Peter Constable in the Unicode Public
> Review Issues #37 "Proposal on Clarification and Consolidation of the
> of ZERO WIDTH JOINER in Indic Scripts". Does anyone know if
> Constable's proposal is now accepted as part of the standard?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniscribe says that Uniscribe released with
Vista RTM (whatever *that* means) supports PR-37. (Not very surprising,
seeing as Constable is of Microsoft.) So if we go by the de-facto
More information about the HarfBuzz