On 14-06-2011 21:24, pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote: > And if someone started thinking for Nastaliq script, he need lots of > glyphs(6 times more than indic scripts) I realize this is getting slightly OT for this thread but really what is the consensus on Nastaliq? A glyphic variant of Arabic? A stylistic one? -- Shriramana Sharma