[HarfBuzz] [p-c] Perso-Arabic symbols for "year"
Khaled Hosny
khaledhosny at eglug.org
Mon Jun 4 01:45:18 PDT 2012
Thanks, I fixed the eight issue.
Regards,
Khaled
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:46:13AM +0530, Connie Bobroff wrote:
> Khaled,
> Thanks and congratulations. The new Amiri works great on Firefox. All 4 digits
> are nicely above the Arabic Number Sign. (Just note that if the right-most
> digit is "8", the bottom, right portion collides with the Arabic Number Sign a
> bit. But no big deal.
> I think the other points, many of which are critical issues, need to be taken
> up in a separate thread. Please hang on.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:26:47AM +0530, Connie Bobroff wrote:
> > Khaled,
> > Yes, please send the version of Amiri that works on Firefox. The latest
> version
> > from SourceForge works very nicely on IE but not Firefox.
>
> File attached.
>
> > Amiri is nice in that it's relatively the same size as Tahoma and
> > therefore, much more suitable for web use than the others.
>
> That is by design, almost all Arabic fonts are ridiculously too small
> compared to Latin for reason beyond me, making it impossible to use the
> same point size for Arabic and non-Arabic text.
>
> > (However, for this particular project, unfortunately, I won't be able
> > to use it since the Heh Goal is not the right shape to match the old
> > style manuscript.)
>
> This was intentional, IMO many of the variant Arabic letters in Unicode
> are really stylistic variants specific to certain calligraphic style
> commonly used for certain languages, Heh Goal is such an example, it is
> a Nastliq-style variant of the regular Heh and a calligrapher writing
> Heh this way will do so even when writing Arabic or any other language
> using Arabic script, the same applies for the so-called Keheh or Farsi
> Kaf which is really a Nastaliq Kaf, and Arabic calligraphers writing in
> Nastaliq use that very same Kaf. So for Amiri, being a Naskh style font,
> I decided that this variance makes no sense and does not match the
> design so I ignored it, however if there is evidence of manuscripts in
> Naskh style making that distinction I'll happily follow it.
>
> > I did not quite see until now these "Advanced Features" on SIL which say
> how
> > many digits the font allows:
> > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=ArabicFonts
> > Probably there should be a discussion somewhere about using "Arabic
> Number
> > Sign" for dates and therefore needing 4 digits. I presume "Arabic Sign
> Samvat"
> > will be given 4 digits but as I said, it's the wrong shape at least for
> me in
> > this project.
>
> The problem is that I don’t really know what is the intended use of the
> Arabic number sign, the available Unicode proposals that supposedly lead to
> its
> inclusion do not say much about it:
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2413.htm
>
> This page says it is “used to indicate the beginning of a number” which
> does not say much either, but suggests it takes an arbitrary number
> digits, so I extended Amiri’s number sign to accept 4 digits:
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/scripts/urdu/
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
>
> > -Connie
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/03/2012 12:19 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > > This have been fixed in FontForge’s master branch, it will break
> feature
> > > files expecting the older behaviour, but there is not much we can
> do
> > > here, and it is hardly the only incompatible fix to FontForge’s
> feature
> > > file code since the last release.
> >
> > Thanks Khaled. I still don't have any idea how to correctly handle
> these
> > sequences in HarfBuzz, but will experiment with Uniscribe, try to see
> if I
> > can
> > figure out what it's doing.
> >
> > behdad
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the HarfBuzz
mailing list