[HarfBuzz] Glyphs with negative advance width
Behdad Esfahbod
behdad at behdad.org
Thu Jun 13 15:05:42 PDT 2013
Ok, negative vs positive is not the bug. Uniscribe zeroes mark widths for
Khmer but we don't. I tried to figure out whether Uniscribe does it by
Unicode category or GDEF, but couldn't build a test font...
At any rate, we need to figure out and do the same. Jonathan, any comments?
behdad
On 13-06-13 05:31 PM, Olivier Berten wrote:
> After khmer character ិ(glyph "uni17b7") in the string និង
>
> Olivier
>
>
> 2013/6/13 Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org <mailto:behdad at behdad.org>>
>
> Ok, I'll take a look. Can you send me the font?
>
> That said, The HarfBuzz API uses signed integers for advance. So I'm not sure
> why this is happening. Where do you observe this behavior again?
>
> b
>
> On 13-06-13 05:16 PM, Olivier Berten wrote:
> > Well... Harfbuzz will be the only one behaving that way then...
> > That font is rendered fine by Adobe, Microsoft, LibreOffice, ... and
> fontforge
> > as well as ttx/fontTools gives a negative advance width... I guess this
> > doesn't push fixing the font ;-)
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/6 Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org <mailto:behdad at behdad.org>
> <mailto:behdad at behdad.org <mailto:behdad at behdad.org>>>
> >
> > Hi Olivier,
> >
> > Thanks for the report. I'm hesitant to make HarfBuzz return
> negative advance
> > values as that can confuse downstream users. If this doesn't prove
> to be a
> > major issue, I think we should ignore it for now.
> >
> > behdad
> >
> > On 13-06-01 05:40 PM, Olivier Berten wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Although it isn't complying with the TrueType/OpenType specifications,
> > > some fonts have some glyphs with negative advance width.
> > >
> > > Advance width (in htmx) is defined as USHORT/uint16 but it seems
> > > everybody else reads it as SHORT/int16.
> > >
> > > In the attached font, glyph "uni17b7" (khmer character ិ) has a
> > > negative advance width. You can try it with the string និងសមភាព
> > >
> > > I wouldn't call this a bug in harfbuzz since it's a font bug but for
> > > compatibility reasons, it might be useful to change it...
> > >
> > > Olivier
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > HarfBuzz mailing list
> > > HarfBuzz at lists.freedesktop.org
> <mailto:HarfBuzz at lists.freedesktop.org>
> <mailto:HarfBuzz at lists.freedesktop.org
> <mailto:HarfBuzz at lists.freedesktop.org>>
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
> > >
> >
> > --
> > behdad
> > http://behdad.org/
> >
> >
>
> --
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/
>
>
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
More information about the HarfBuzz
mailing list