[HarfBuzz] [Indic] Inspecting the font for consonant position with Free Sans
behdad at behdad.org
Tue Mar 5 17:00:39 PST 2013
I can also confirm that the dev2 and deva tables of Free Sans have the exact
same features. That's plain broken stuff we have to deal with :(.
On 13-03-05 07:58 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> With Free Sans, and a sequence like <U+0924,U+094D,U+0930> (TA,Virama,RA),
> HarfBuzz is failing to for the correct conjunct while Uniscribe doesn't.
> The problem is: Free Sans has both deva and dev2 tables. HarfBuzz correctly
> chooses dev2. Now, we then proceed to find the base. For that, we check
> whether "Virama,RA" matches the blwf feature. It doesn't. As such we take RA
> to be the syllable base, and things go down from there.
> Uniscribe somehow figures it out. Assuming that Uniscribe is also using the
> dev2 table, I guessed that Free Sans has wrong blwf tables (simply copied over
> from the deva table) and as such matches 'RA,Virama' instead of 'Virama,RA'.
> Indeed, looking for that makes HarfBuzz correctly shape the sequence.
> So, I'm going to change the Indic shaper to look for both sequences, Virama
> first and Virama last, when categorizing consonants. It's a bummer that we
> should take such performance hit because of some broken fonts, but that
> shouldn't be a big deal.
> I can't think of any situation that this would have unwanted consequences.
> Will implement, test, and push.
More information about the HarfBuzz