[HarfBuzz] Kerning, glyph width, and x advance

[Simon Cozens]

On 04/09/2015 16:32, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> I think it's only true if kerning is the only advance adjustment that
> shaper applied, and you can only guess if it's true or not. So this
> difference is more like accumulated adjustment, not necessary caused by
> kerning.

I think for my purposes that's the same - it's the adjustment that I
need to make to the "natural" glyph positioning done by the PDF.